I'll tell you why. Because the legal industry has built an entire culture around making clients feel stupid. The jargon, the formality, the six-page emails that say nothing, the invoices that arrive without context. It's all designed to create a dependency, not a partnership.

Here's a radical idea. You should understand every single structural decision in your venture. Not at a "leave it to the lawyers" level. At a "I can explain this to my co-founder and my investor in plain language" level.

If your lawyer can't explain your cap table in two minutes without jargon, that's not your problem. That's theirs.

If your governance framework lives in a 200-page document nobody has read, it doesn't exist. Governance that nobody understands is governance that nobody follows.

The best framework I ever designed fit on a napkin. Literally. A founder and I sat at a bar in Nairobi and sketched the entire decision-making structure for a multi-country operation on a cocktail napkin. That napkin became the blueprint for the formal docs.

Simple doesn't mean unsophisticated. Simple means everyone knows the rules.

Demand clarity from your advisors. If they can't deliver it, find ones who can.

#LegalClarity #VentureArchitecture #Mexzungu #FounderAdvice

Nairobi. Paris. Mexico City. New York. Barcelona. Kigali. Mauritius. Johannesburg. The list keeps growing. Every market has different regulations, different corporate forms, different cultural expectations around how business gets done.

But the pattern underneath is always the same.

Business moves at the speed of trust.

Not at the speed of your slide deck. Not at the speed of your legal review. Trust.

In Nairobi, I learned that the deal closes over dinner, not in the boardroom. In Paris, I learned that precision earns respect before personality does. In Mexico City, I learned that family structures and business structures are often the same conversation. In New York, I learned that nobody cares where you're from if you can close.

The best venture architects aren't just technically excellent. They're culturally fluent. They know that a governance framework that works in Delaware might collapse in Nairobi. That an investor relationship built on New York norms might alienate a founder in Kigali.

This is what you can't learn from a textbook. It comes from being in those rooms, in those countries, making those mistakes, and earning that trust.

Structure is universal. Context is everything.

#CrossBorder #VentureArchitecture #Mexzungu #GlobalFounder

Different deals, different structures, different continents. I built the governance frameworks, structured the entities, sat in the rooms where capital decisions were made.

You want to know the thing that almost killed the biggest deals?

Misaligned expectations between founders and investors about control.

Not valuation. Not terms. Control.

Who picks the board? Who approves the next raise? What happens if the founder and the lead investor disagree on strategy?

I watched smart people burn months because they negotiated the number on the term sheet but never designed the decision-making architecture underneath it.

The money is never the hard part. The structure around the money is.

Every cap raise should start with a governance conversation, not a valuation conversation. Who decides what? Under what conditions? With what override mechanisms?

If you're raising right now and nobody has asked you these questions yet, your advisors are doing it wrong.

The money will come. The architecture determines whether you survive once it does.

#Governance #StartupFundraising #VentureArchitecture #Mexzungu

I grew up in Mexico. My dad spent his career in government. He signed me up for law school without asking. Having a gap year wasn't a thing back then. So I became a lawyer.

I went to big law because I wanted to tackle big monsters. Then Yale. Then Mauritius, which is where my Africa story actually started.

From there I flew to Kigali for four days to sign financing for a campus. I stayed four months. Negotiating a bond with the government pension fund, a loan with the largest local bank, and building terms with a Turkish contractor. Four days became four months because the work was real and someone had to stay until it was done.

Then came Nairobi. I was on a business trip from Mauritius to Dakar. Two-day layover. COVID hit. Two days became two years.

Every step was an accident that turned into a decision.

And every accident built the exact skill set that no traditional path could have assembled. Cross-border structuring. Multi-jurisdictional governance. Capital raising across cultures where trust matters more than term sheets.

Mexzungu exists for the people who took the weird path.

The founder who grew up in Lagos, studied in London, and is building in Kigali. The operator who spent five years in corporate and now can't breathe in those rooms anymore. The creative who knows their business needs real structure but can't stomach the pin-striped-suit consulting world.

You don't need to fit the mould. You need someone who understands why you broke it.

Mexzungu is an outlaw studio built by an outsider, for outsiders. Structure without the straitjacket. Big law rhythm meets rock and roll rhyme.

The beautifully unconventional ones. That's who we're here for.

#FounderManifesto #VentureArchitecture #Mexzungu #BuildDifferent

Every founder who calls me is in one of three situations. Here's which one you are.

The Builder. You're pre-Series A. You've got traction, maybe some revenue, and you're about to raise real money for the first time. Your structure was built on a template from the internet. You know it won't hold, but you don't know where it'll break. You need someone to pressure-test the whole thing before an investor does.

The Scaler. You've raised. Maybe $2M, maybe $20M. Now you're expanding into new markets, adding entities, hiring across borders. The structure that worked for one country is cracking under the weight of three. You need architectural oversight, not more lawyers billing by the hour.

The Fixer. Something already broke. A co-founder dispute. A cap table that doesn't work anymore. A board that can't make decisions. An investor relationship that went sideways. You need someone who's seen this exact situation before and knows the structural path out.

All three need the same thing. Not legal advice. Venture architecture.

Someone who can look at the whole picture, not just the document in front of them. Someone who's been the operator, the board member, and the investor. Not just the advisor.

If you recognised yourself in one of those, that's exactly who Mexzungu is for.

DM me which one you are. I'll tell you the first thing I'd look at.

Mission Briefing

Once upon a spreadsheet, a founder thought she owned 55% of her company. She'd been showing that number to investors for 18 months. Then three SAFEs converted, the real math came in, and she owned 31%. This is the story of how that happens, and how to make sure it doesn't happen to you.

The Deep Dive

Your Cap Table Is Lying to You

Let me tell you about something that happens more often than anyone in this industry wants to admit.

A founder builds something real. Gets traction. Raises a bit of money from people who believe in the vision. Then one day, usually on the worst possible day, someone runs the actual numbers and the story the spreadsheet has been telling turns out to be fiction.

I've watched this play out more times than I'd like. The details change every time. The plot never does.

1. Departure (Business Launch)

Two friends start a company. They split the equity 50/50 because they're equal partners and that feels right. They set aside 10% for an option pool because someone told them they should. The cap table is clean:

Everyone's happy. The spreadsheet looks great. Life is good.

2. Layover (Angel Funding)

Over the next year, they raise $400K from three angel investors. One SAFE at a $3M cap. Another at $5M. A third at $4M with a 20% discount. Three separate conversations, three handshakes, three moments of "we just got funded!" excitement.

Here's the thing about SAFEs. They stand for Simple Agreement for Future Equity, which is one of the great marketing achievements of our time. Every word in that name is designed to make you feel comfortable. "Simple." "Future." "Equity." It all sounds so... manageable.

But SAFEs don't show up on your cap table. Not yet. They're promises. They're guests who've RSVP'd to the party but haven't arrived yet. So the spreadsheet still reads 45/45/10. The founders still tell everyone they own 90% of their company.

They believe it. Why wouldn't they? The spreadsheet says so.

3. Arrival (VC Investment)

A VC offers to lead a $2M round at $10M pre-money. Everyone celebrates the valuation. Champagne. LinkedIn posts. "Excited to announce..."

Then the lawyers run the conversion model. And the spreadsheet finally tells the truth.

Combined founder ownership: 52%. Down from the 90% they'd been telling themselves. And here's what makes it worse: none of this was hidden. Nobody lied. Nobody acted in bad faith. The math was always going to land here. The founders just never asked the spreadsheet the right questions.

Why stories like this keep repeating

There are three reasons, and they show up in almost every version of this story I've seen.

The invisible instrument problem. SAFEs live outside your cap table until they convert. So you issue one, then another, then a third, and your spreadsheet keeps telling you a story that stopped being true months ago. It's like checking your bank balance without counting all the pizza you ordered on Uber Eats last weekend. The number looks fine until it doesn't.

The scenario nobody models. Every time I sit down with a founder, I ask the same question: "What does your cap table look like if you raise your Series A at $8M instead of $12M?" The most common answer is a pause, followed by "I'd have to ask my lawyer." That pause is where the problem lives. Your lawyer should have already walked you through this. If they haven't, they're processing paperwork, not doing architecture.

The option pool shuffle. This one is subtle, and I want to explain it gently because it's not anyone being malicious. It's just how the game works.

When a VC says they want a 15% option pool "post-money," it sounds reasonable. But the standard practice is that this pool comes from the founders' shares, not from the new investment. So before the round closes, the founders dilute themselves to create the pool. The VC's percentage is calculated after that dilution.

It's standard. It's legal. And it means the founders are quietly paying for something that benefits the company broadly. Most founders don't fully understand this mechanic until after the documents are signed. Not because anyone hid it. Just because nobody explained it in plain language.

What you can do about it

The good news is that none of this is complicated. It's just maths that nobody does until the moment it matters.

Model your SAFEs today.

I built a free cap table calculator you can use right now. It's pre-filled with the example from this story, so you can see the mechanics in action. Then clear the yellow cells and plug in your own numbers.

Google Sheet · click to make your own copy

Enter your founders, your SAFEs, your Series A terms, and watch what happens. Model what happens at three different valuations: your optimistic case, a realistic one, and the scenario you'd rather not think about. If you can see the range, you can make informed decisions. If you can't, you're writing a story without knowing the ending.

Keep a running total. Every time you issue a new SAFE, update the model. If the next one pushes your combined founder ownership below 50% at any reasonable conversion scenario, that's worth a conversation before you sign.

Understand the option pool before you negotiate. When a term sheet says "15% option pool," ask: pre-money or post-money? Who bears the dilution? Is the pool sized for your actual hiring plan, or is it bigger than you need? These aren't adversarial questions. They're structural ones. Good investors will respect you for asking.

Get a proper cap table tool. Carta, Pulley, Ledgy, whatever works in your jurisdiction. Not a spreadsheet. A tool that models conversion scenarios and shows you the real numbers. Because spreadsheets don't update themselves, and the gap between what you think you own and what you actually own tends to grow quietly.

The Blueprint

Cap Table Reality Check: 5 Questions

Grab the free calculator and answer these five questions:

The Docket

Things that caught my eye this week

The Question

When did you first realise your cap table was off?

Click the one that's you.

Every click opens an email. Add your story or just send it blank. I read every one.

Writing this from Barcelona, where the jacarandas are about to bloom and the terrace is finally warm enough to work from again. Next issue lands next Monday. Until then, maybe go check that spreadsheet. Just in case.

Have a great day ahead,

Pepe Carrillo

Founder, Mexzungu Group · Venture Architect

mexzungu.com · pepecarrillo.co · LinkedIn

Mexzungu Group · Outlaw Studio · Barcelona

The Outlaw Chronicles is for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. For structuring decisions, engage qualified professionals in your jurisdiction.

Unsubscribe · AI Policy · Privacy